Surgeon Satisfaction During Endoscopic Management of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea: A Comparison Between Propofol-Remifentanil and Isoflurane-Remifentanil Anesthesia

AUTHORS

Valliolah Hassani 1 , Mahzad Alimian 2 , * , Mohammad Farhadi 1 , Behrouz Zaman 1 , Masood Mohseni 1

1 Department of Anesthesiology, Rasoul-e Akram Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, IR Iran

2 Department of Anesthesiology, Rasoul-e Akram Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, [email protected], IR Iran

How to Cite: Hassani V, Alimian M, Farhadi M, Zaman B, Mohseni M. Surgeon Satisfaction During Endoscopic Management of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea: A Comparison Between Propofol-Remifentanil and Isoflurane-Remifentanil Anesthesia, J Minim Invasive Surg Sci. Online ahead of Print ; 1(2):62-6. doi: 10.5812/jmiss.1839.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences: 1 (2); 62-6
Published Online: September 30, 2012
Article Type: Test Research
Received: July 6, 2011
Accepted: May 8, 2012
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background: Surgeons depend to a large degree on the amount of blood loss and a clear view of the surgical field, when conducting endoscopic procedures in order to achieve satisfactory outcomes. The anesthesiologists choice of method for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia plays a major role in achieving this goal.

Objectives: This study was performed in order to compare the two most well-known methods in this regard; total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and venous inhalational mixed anesthesia (VIMA).

Patients and Methods: This study included the endoscopic management of 89 patients with cerebrospinal leakage (CSF leakage) covering a period of nine years (1999-2008) for whom a subarachnoid injection of fluorescein was first administered, and afterwards they were maintained under general anesthesia using two distinct methods; propofol-remifentanil versus isofluraneremifentanil (inhalational or intravenous). During the operation, hemodynamic indices, blood loss, and surgeons satisfaction, were assessed and compared between the two groups.

Results: Endoscopic management and autografts were successful in repairing anterior skull defects in 90% of cases. Regarding the surgeons satisfaction level, and hemodynamic stability no significant difference between the two groups was observed (P > 0.01).

Conclusions: Both isoflurane and propofol in combination with remifentanil afford optimal surgical conditions with regard to hemodynamic parameters and the satisfaction of the surgeon with the surgical field.\r\n

Keywords

Cerebrospinal Fluid Propofol Remifentanil Isoflurane Endoscopy

© 2012, Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

Full Text

Full text is available in PDF

COMMENTS

LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: