Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Intraoperative Complications During Gynecologic Laparoscopy: Does Previous Surgery Matter?

Pooja R Patel 1 , Alpa M Nick 2 , Michael Frumovitz 2 , Anna Militello 3 , Kathleen M Schmeler 2 , Pamela T Soliman 2 , Ricardo dos Reis 2 and Pedro T Ramirez 2 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, Galveston, USA
2 Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
3 Department of Gynecology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Article information
  • Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences: May 01, 2014, 3 (2); e12926
  • Published Online: May 30, 2014
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: June 13, 2013
  • Accepted: April 12, 2014

To Cite: Patel P R, Nick A M, Frumovitz M, Militello A, Schmeler K M, et al. Intraoperative Complications During Gynecologic Laparoscopy: Does Previous Surgery Matter?, J Minim Invasive Surg Sci. 2014 ; 3(2):e12926.

Copyright © 2014, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center and Mediterranean & Middle Eastern Endoscopic Surgery Association. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Kaplan M, Salman B, Yilmaz TU, Oguz M. A quality of life comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches in acute appendicitis: a randomised prospective study. Acta Chir Belg. 2009; 109(3): 356-63[PubMed]
  • 2. Kornblith AB, Huang HQ, Walker JL, Spirtos NM, Rotmensch J, Cella D. Quality of life of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing laparoscopic international federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging compared with laparotomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(32): 5337-42[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(32): 5331-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Peters MJ, Mukhtar A, Yunus RM, Khan S, Pappalardo J, Memon B, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104(6): 1548-61[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, Bozzetti MC, Fachel JM, Furness S, Garry R, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (2)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Wang L, Merkur H, Hardas G, Soo S, Lujic S. Laparoscopic hysterectomy in the presence of previous caesarean section: a review of one hundred forty-one cases in the Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery Unit. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010; 17(2): 186-91[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Kumakiri J, Kikuchi I, Kitade M, Kuroda K, Matsuoka S, Tokita S, et al. Incidence of complications during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in patients after previous laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010; 17(4): 480-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Bouasker I, El Ouaer MA, Smaali I, Khalfallah M, Ben Achour J, Najah N, et al. [Laparascopic cholecystectomy on a previously operated abdomen]. Tunis Med. 2010; 88(2): 88-91[PubMed]
  • 9. Dubuisson J, Botchorischvili R, Perrette S. Incidence of intraabdominal adhesions in a continuous series of 1000 laparoscopic procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203(2): 1110-3
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments